For every independent study proving aspartame dangers, a corporate study is pay-rolled to claim safe findings. So here we are – stuck in an research battle; an information war – all for profit at the expense of YOUR health and the health of YOUR children.
The fact that aspartame has been proven to be harmful to humans is enough to ban it – even if in just ONE STUDY. If this were vitamin C, it would have been banned in less than 30 seconds.
Profit Over Health
There is NO QUESTION that today, the Western world survives on one of the most unnatural diets known to mankind. Some of the most dangerous chemical compounds are found in the artificial sweeteners, and these are some of the most prolific.
The safety of aspartame has been nothing more than a research war – from the beginning.
Obesity and childhood disease are at record highs. Cancer and cardiovascular disease in the United States are among the highest in the world, and our association with medical doctors and pharmaceuticals represents the third leading cause of death in the United States; attributed to unnecessary surgeries, medication errors in hospitals, infections in hospitals, and the negative effects of synthetic drugs and medications.
So, WHY is aspartame still on the global market today, and WHO gave the EFSA the power to decide aspartame’s “final safety approval” fifty years after the fact?
The EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) has recently been commissioned to either condemn or bless aspartame for the open European market – again???? How many more times will the research proving aspartame is harmful to human health be questioned, picked apart, and voted on?
It appears that this research war will continue for as long as aspartame – proven to cause damage to human health – is still on the market.
Yet, another final opinion will be adopted by the EFSA at the end of November 2013, and published in early December 2013, together with the results of the online public consultation, feedback from the meeting, and EFSA’s responses to the comments received.
Let’s hope that they FINALLY step up to the plate and vote to honor the damning research ….
The Latest Propaganda
OK, here’s the latest – the EFSA is considering over 200 comments received during its online public consultation on its draft opinion on aspartame, as well as key information (whatever that really means) from a wide-ranging exchange with “stakeholders ” (investors, Big Corps, Big Pharma, victims, researchers? WHO are the stakeholders?)
This process has ensured that no stone has been left unturned and that the widest possible range of scientific views and information are considered before EFSA’s Panel on Food Additives and Nutrient Sources Added to Food (ANS Panel) adopts its opinion.
We’ve been down this road how many times before!!
Either they will do the right thing and deem aspartame as a carcinogen with respect to the research PROVING that it is, or they will cower to the pressures of money and “power-wanna-be’s,” and santify aspartame as safe.
Hey, it’s a flip of the coin these days.
Non-corporate researchers, alternative doctors, nutritionists, consumers, and numerous interest groups worldwide know that aspartame is a deadly neurotoxin. Research scientists worldwide have PROVEN time and again that aspartame causes:
- brain tumors;
Dr. Morando Soffritti of the Cesare Maltoni Cancer Research Center, European Ramazzini Foundation of Oncology and Environmental Sciences performed the most recent damning research in two Italian studies proving aspartame causes lymphoma and leukemia.
Dr. Soffritii did two studies because the propaganda discrediting his first study was so strong – disrepute originating from US researchers and the corporations funding them – he simply repeated the study. Interestingly, the second study presented even MORE damning results.
Dr. Soffritii continues to push the dangerous health effects of aspartame despite the arrogance and greed this insidious research war is creating.
It’s politics and profit at the expense of your health. Who do you trust to decide your fate – the politicians or the independent research scientists?
Heads or tails?